We have all kept a bad employee longer than we should have.
In my case, it comes from many factors: Timing is bad as we are very busy and no time to train a new employee, the bad employee that I know versus the one I don't and we sometimes feel bad for the person.
Do I have to include myself in considering this question?
Yes, I would guess most employers have.
I totally agree with Jim, there are many reasons too. Some of mine were fear, timing, family members, finding someone better, trying to meet the work load, not being able to figure out just who the bad apple was, disagreement with other managers on who the bad apple was, taking personal blame in that I did not train them properly or provide clear precise instructions, needing to consult my lawyer first, gathering documentation to make it stick, refusing to fire when angry and doing it later when I was calm. Every minute too long past the decision point, is way too long IMHO.
I will add that waiting until you are no longer angry with the employee is fruitless, as 30 minutes later or 30 days later, they will have you mad all over:)
I now use a simple formula. I give the person a day off, or normally they just take it off without notice. If my day goes smoother, I have less stress, less mistakes and I simply find myself enjoying my work day, I take notice. I then ask myself, why do I want that person around me?
I am right now and reading this reminds me that I should do something about it. It has gone past the time that I cared about his inefficiencies and slow pace to were I have accepted. Thinking of it know this is terrible for business and for other employees to see. I know his family is in financial problems but that shouldn't sway me anymore.
Thanks Woodweb for bringing clarity to a ignored problem
"I know his family is in financial problems but that shouldn't sway me anymore."
I hear ya. This may sound crude but it's legit, I think... I know an odd old couple that owns a pizza shop in town. She's Eastern European--I have a lot of ties there, and it does mean something, in terms of life approach.
So they had the worst employee ever, delivering. After disappointing them for a year, he came in and asked for a raise, because he "has 4 kids". She looked him square in the eyes and asked "do I look like I #$%& your wife 4 times, without a plan?"
I kinda chuckle everytime I think about this one. It's pretty raw, but there's something there. How much can you ride the train for free because you set yourself up for failure? If you play ball, it's one thing--but if you cost everyone around you, it's another.
"Some of mine were fear, timing, family members, finding someone better, trying to meet the work load, not being able to figure out just who the bad apple was, disagreement with other managers on who the bad apple was, taking personal blame in that I did not train them properly or provide clear precise instructions, needing to consult my lawyer first, gathering documentation to make it stick, refusing to fire when angry and doing it later when I was calm."
That's it, isn't it? You were where my boss-pants people are right now.
I benefit alot from this website because I get an employee idea out and get an owner point of view back.
I think this particular employee point-of-view might be very important.
You know what it looks like when a terrible employee doesn't get fired, from another employee's point of view? Like it's impossible to get fired. That's way too much power to give to anyone when your name and credit is on the line.
I think that people have a general disposition on everything. IOW an angry person will be angry, a bored person will be bored, a cheerful person will be cheerful, an antagonistic person will be antagonistic.
Generally speaking an angry person or a fearful person or an apathetic person will always make thing worse. E.G.
I had an angry person who was once working on a cnc machine, changing a gear, he thought nothing of using a sludge hammer on the aluminum gear, as this is the nature of an angry person.
I once had a fearful person relentlessly sabotage my best efforts to find a new foreman as this was the nature of a fearful person.
I had a cheerful person ALWAYS try to make things better and no matter what had a positive attitude as this is the nature of a cheerful person.
That being said, the overarching decision maker is to define what their job is and determine some sort of metric that indicates what their production is. E.G. If he is an installer then how many boxes does he install. If he operates the panel saw then how many panels does he saw. If is an assembler than how many boxes does he assemble.
If you do not have a metric of how long these things should take then that is your first problem. The second is to communicate what is expected to him. The 3rd is get that level of production out of him.
I think the gut feel method is a bad way to go as it will bounce some keepers and keep some that should be bounced.
"the overarching decision maker is to define what their job is and determine some sort of metric that indicates what their production is. E.G. If he is an installer then how many boxes does he install. If he operates the panel saw then how many panels does he saw. If is an assembler than how many boxes does he assemble.
If you do not have a metric of how long these things should take then that is your first problem. The second is to communicate what is expected to him. The 3rd is get that level of production out of him."
Oh man, are you ever preaching to the choir on this one.
See, I think a whole lot of cooky people can have a place. For example--our door stainer. She's been at it for 15 years. Comes in everyday, on time. Does exactly that--stains doors. All day. Nothing else.
It's a thing of beauty really. She's a little cognitively challenged, and requires an occasional creative human resources approach--but that sure beats retraining every couple of months because the job is that boring.
She falls in the categories of "follow and stay out of the way".
Not everyone needs to be a superstar. But the mastermind needs a concise idea on expectations, and a solid SOP whe it comes to the run-of-the-mill stuff.
I've kept bad employees for all of the above reasons...
..one of them is the worry about changing employees during a 'busy time and not being able to keep up'. when i finally got rid of the bad apple during a busy time, everyone else was so glad for him being gone that we actually got the project done faster without worrying about the bad guy causing errors or issues, and they were glad to work a little harder to get it done for the simply enjoyment of not having the corrupt person around. Made me realize I should have gotten rid of them a LONG time prior, it would have helped everybody : employees, owners, clients, vendors, etc.
also being concerned about 'their hard situation' and letting them go would make their life harder.. well, realizing that everybody else who IS doing an excellent job is having their life made more difficult by the presence of the bad employee made me realize how unfair it was to keep him around at everybody's elses expense. yes, he may have had a 'bad situation' but it was also a situation he got himself into by his choices, and keeping him just brought us all lower.
positive twist: getting fired from our shop eventually led to help making better choices in his life. he was riding on the fact that he knew he could keep screwing up in life and be okay because he had a great job to prop up his bad choices. getting fired was probably the best thing for him at the time to make serious changes that he had been unable to change while making serious money.
Just fired a guy who had been been making me angry since I hired him a few months ago. I didn't realize how much his negative attitude was poisoning the atmosphere.
He would tick me off, I would resolve to fire him at the end of the day, then I would cool off and change my mind.
The day after one unplanned absence, I came in early and forced myself to fire him by running his final payroll check. When he arrived the typical 15 minutes late, I had his check in my hand and no chance to reconsider.
The timing was bad, as we are very busy, but it's amazing how much more I like my job now.
FORUM GUIDELINES: Please review the guidelines below before posting at WOODWEB's Interactive Message Boards(return to top)
WOODWEB is a professional industrial woodworking site. Hobbyist and homeowner woodworking questions are inappropriate.
Messages should be kept reasonably short and on topic, relating to the focus of the forum. Responses should relate to the original question.
A valid email return address must be included with each message.
Advertising is inappropriate. The only exceptions are the Classified Ads Exchange, Machinery Exchange, Lumber Exchange, and Job Opportunities and Services Exchange. When posting listings in these areas, review the posting instructions carefully.
Subject lines may be edited for length and clarity.
"Cross posting" is not permitted. Choose the best forum for your question, and post your question at one forum only.
Messages requesting private responses will be removed - Forums are designed to provide information and assistance for all of our visitors. Private response requests are appropriate at WOODWEB's Exchanges and Job Opportunities and Services.
Messages that accuse businesses or individuals of alleged negative actions or behavior are inappropriate since WOODWEB is unable to verify or substantiate the claims.
Posts with the intent of soliciting answers to surveys are not appropriate. Contact WOODWEB for more information on initiating a survey.
Excessive forum participation by an individual upsets the balance of a healthy forum atmosphere. Individuals who excessively post responses containing marginal content will be considered repeat forum abusers.
Responses that initiate or support inappropriate and off-topic discussion of general politics detract from the professional woodworking focus of WOODWEB, and will be removed.
Participants are encouraged to use their real name when posting. Intentionally using another persons name is prohibited, and posts of this nature will be removed at WOODWEB's discretion.
Carefully review your message before clicking on the "Send Message" button - you will not be able to revise the message once it has been sent.
You will be notified of responses to the message(s) you posted via email. Be sure to enter your email address correctly.
WOODWEB's forums are a highly regarded resource for professional woodworkers. Messages and responses that are crafted in a professional and civil manner strengthen this resource. Messages that do not reflect a professional tone reduce the value of our forums.
Messages are inappropriate when their content: is deemed libelous in nature or is based on rumor, fails to meet basic standards of decorum, contains blatant advertising or inappropriate emphasis on self promotion (return to top).
Libel: Posts which defame an individual or organization, or employ a tone which can be viewed as malicious in nature. Words, pictures, or cartoons which expose a person or organization to public hatred, shame, disgrace, or ridicule, or induce an ill opinion of a person or organization, are libelous.
Improper Decorum: Posts which are profane, inciting, disrespectful or uncivil in tone, or maliciously worded. This also includes the venting of unsubstantiated opinions. Such messages do little to illuminate a given topic, and often have the opposite effect. Constructive criticism is acceptable (return to top).
Advertising: The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not an advertising venue. Companies participating in a Forum discussion should provide specific answers to posted questions. WOODWEB suggests that businesses include an appropriately crafted signature in order to identify their company. A well meaning post that seems to be on-topic but contains a product reference may do your business more harm than good in the Forum environment. Forum users may perceive your references to specific products as unsolicited advertising (spam) and consciously avoid your web site or services. A well-crafted signature is an appropriate way to advertise your services that will not offend potential customers. Signatures should be limited to 4-6 lines, and may contain information that identifies the type of business you're in, your URL and email address (return to top).
Repeated Forum Abuse:
Forum participants who repeatedly fail to follow WOODWEB's Forum Guidelines may encounter difficulty when attempting to post messages.
There are often situations when the original message asks for opinions: "What is the best widget for my type of shop?". To a certain extent, the person posting the message is responsible for including specific questions within the message. An open ended question (like the one above) invites responses that may read as sales pitches. WOODWEB suggests that companies responding to such a question provide detailed and substantive replies rather than responses that read as a one-sided product promotion. It has been WOODWEB's experience that substantive responses are held in higher regard by our readers (return to top).
The staff of WOODWEB assume no responsibility for the accuracy, content, or outcome of any posting transmitted at WOODWEB's Message Boards. Participants should undertake the use of machinery, materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB's Message Boards after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages it deems inappropriate. (return to top)
Forum Posting Form Guidelines
The name you enter in this field will be the name that appears with your post or response (return to form).
Personal or business website links must point to the author's website. Inappropriate links will be removed without notice, and at WOODWEB's sole discretion. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
Your e-mail address will not be publicly viewable. Forum participants will be able to contact you using a contact link (included with your post) that is substituted for your actual address. You must include a valid email address in this field. (return to form)
Subject may be edited for length and clarity. Subject lines should provide an indication of the content of your post. (return to form)
Thread Related Link and Image Guidelines
Thread Related Links posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should point to locations that provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related Link that directs visitors to an area with inappropriate content will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
Thread Related File Uploads
Thread Related Files posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. Video Files: acceptable video formats are: .MOV .AVI .WMV .MPEG .MPG .FLV .MP4 (Image Upload Tips) If you encounter any difficulty when uploading video files, E-mail WOODWEB for assistance. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related File that contains inappropriate content will be removed, and uploaded files that are not directly related to the message thread will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links, files, or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
The editors, writers, and staff at WOODWEB try to promote safe practices.
What is safe for one woodworker under certain conditions may not be safe
for others in different circumstances. Readers should undertake the use
of materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB after considerate evaluation,
and at their own risk.