The best equipment I have in my shop was made outside America.
I have a Butfering Widebelt sander, an Altendorf saw & a Martin Jointer all made in Germany. I think all my Festo tools were made in Germany too. My planer was made in Italy. I have a couple of SCM shapers that were made in Italy too. I have a lot of Canon camera equipment that was made in Japan.
The Apple Computer I am writing this post on was made in China.
Where are we going to get woodworking equipment from when the cost goes up 30%?
Are we hoping that Black & Decker will get back in the game? How long do you think it will take to tool up domestic manufacturers to produce these vital pieces of equipment? How much longer until we have confidence in their quality & longevity?
US beef production in 2015 was about 23.7 billion pounds.
US exports were about 2.3 billion pounds. Call it 10%. We ate the other 90%. And then some, as we also imported 3.4 billion pounds.
That doesn't comport with "Exports of Beef from the US far equal or outsupport (sic) the US Consumption." (which seems to imply that we export more beef than we eat.)
If you were being sarcastic, I salute you. If not, I guess you support Tim's idea that Trump = Hitler, etc., etc. The usual liberal stuff.
But, that's old and tired. Bush was Hitler. McCain was Hitler. Romney was Hitler. That awful guy Trump won in spite of media lies and distortions because his message resonated. How could that possibly happen?
I know. Let's blame the Russkies! Make something up. Leak it. Repeat the lie enough times and people will buy it. Yeah, that's the ticket.
And now, when I coax 15%/year out of my investments in major US corporations, I come to find out that I'm a welfare queen.
A veritable welfare leech!
I'm just gonna sit back and watch heads explode due to an overload of cognitive dissonance.
You will wait forever as I'm sure you read all about the minor Flynn kerfuffle, just as I did and no elaboration from me will change your mind.
I've fired many people (in "at will" states) over the years and never thought about it again after the carefully considered decision was made.
Trump will no doubt fire many people in the future for good, or even no reason at all considering that we're talking about people who serve at his pleasure. Maybe he'll even get around to dismantling the politicized civil service.
Maybe after he signs an Executive Order removing the basis for the existence of federal government employee unions. Even FDR considered them an abomination. And they are.
I'm no "Trumpkin" as you put it. I'm good with cutting taxes, cutting regulations and cutting government in general at all levels.
Can't happen soon enough and I think it all will happen over the next couple of years.
Tariffs? Bad idea. Very bad idea. But notice that no tariff has yet been seriously proposed -- that is, put into actual proposed legislative language.
I think he's trolling you and your ilk. He'll use the threat here and there in negotiations, but has no intention of actually using tariffs. He knows that they're not a good idea. Maybe in some minor, symbolic case. In any case, no tariff of any consequence is likely to ever be enacted.
BTW, speaking of the WSJ, have I heard of it?
Why, yes, I have. I first talked my old man into a subscription in 1965. It was something like $11 a year (about 4.4 cents a copy, delivered by US mail! Ah, the good old days.) and I was 13 years old. I've been trading and investing ever since.
Somehow, ignorant doofus, Hitlerian-following conservative and corporate welfare queen (!) that I am, I managed to retire 37 years ago at age 28.
There were days in 1980 when I made more than a million dollars and days when I lost more than a million, but since there were many more of the former than the latter it all worked out.
I've owned various businesses, some with 20-30 employees, which is why I can sometimes make a germane comment here, even though I'm only an amateur woodworker.
I dumped my WSJ subscription after Bob Bartley (editor for 30 years) retired. The "news" pages were always corrupted by a liberal slant and the editorial pages then went right into the toilet. Bye, bye WSJ.
So, no, I have no need of any advice regarding the WSJ
You sound like KellyAnne Conway.
(I miss her. She could bob & weave like Muhammed Ali).
You wrote: "I've fired many people (in "at will" states) over the years and never thought about it again after the carefully considered decision was made.
Trump will no doubt fire many people in the future for good, or even no reason at all considering that we're talking about people who serve at his pleasure. Maybe he'll even get around to dismantling the politicized civil service."
All of that ramble has nothing at all to do with why Trump fired General Flynn. It was not just a "minor kerfluffle" as you encountered in your many successful businesses.
General Flynn was pushed out of office for illegal contacts with the Russians.
The reasons behind Flynn's departure were far cry from someone who maybe "sanded through the veneer" at on of your many businesses.
We will, eventually, learn the extent of the Trump campaign connection with Russia. This investigation is not going to go away just because Trump tweets that let CNN or the NYT are fake news.
Then, of course, there is the issue of competency.
Did they even vet the man they selected for top position as National Security Advisor?
Or were they completely familiar with who they are doing business with?
But the competency issues just go on & on & on. What started out as a lark to promote the Trump brand took on a life of its own and a lot of people who are rightfully angry were perfectly willing to overlook even their own self interest for anything that will give them some hope to hang on to.
These people are capable of thinking jobs don't depend on global markets and global supply chains. (Even Trump has his signature red neckties made in China.)
And then you got the wall to make us all "safe."
If you want to keep bad hombres out then legalize drugs and kill their cash flow. We can't, however, do that because drug interdiction is just as much of an industry as drug selling is. If you take away the crime you take away the revenue for private prisons. The reason we haven't won the war on drugs and it's because there's just too much money in it for all sides involved.
Trump should have stayed with Celebrity Apprentice and we should have some adults in the white house rather than President Bannon.
On the plus side the Trump people are considering Jon Huntsman for a role in the State Dept. This is a good choice. Huntsman should have been the Republican standard bearer last time around.
There are a lot of good people getting iced out of the jobs because the Donald's thin skin. He needs to collect around him people who are willing to disagree. It's not going to work out well if the only people that can be considered must first pass the Breitbart litmus test.
The Steve Miller kid who said: "The President will not be questioned" is a good example of who we don't want in the loop.
Here's how "vetting" of the National Security Adviser worked in the previous administration.
General Jim Jones NSA 1-20-09 – 10-8-10
An absolutely, totally outstanding choice. 4 star Marine general. 40 years of military experience. Commander of U.S. Euro Command. Supreme Allied Commander Europe. Eisenhower held this position in slightly testier times. First Marine general to serve as both.
If the position required Senate confirmation, he would have been approved 100-0.
Is that a guy you would be comfortable with as National Security Adviser?
I think so. No matter how feckless the president may be.
Unfortunately, he only lasted a year and a half. My opinion is that he was the only available semi-sort-of Democrat with impeccable credentials that dear leader could recruit. But, just for a while, because he wasn't really serious about national security or who was NSA, and Jones figured that out and quietly left.
Thomas Donilon, NSA 10-8-10 – 6-30-13
Total, pure party hack. Lawyer. No experience worth mentioning. A total joke of an NSA. Look him up and compare him to General Jones.
Well, wait, there is this one item from Wiki -- "Exec VP for Law/Policy at Fannie Mae, (...) as a registered lobbyist from 1999 through 2005."
There you go. Says it all. A Fannie lobbyist for the mortgage meltdown. He was there busy lobbying through all of the most important years building up to the meltdown. Great. I'll guess he was big buds with Barney Frank.
If he needed to be confirmed, there was no way that this guy would have gotten more than 30 votes. Dear leader didn't care because he didn't need confirmation and he was beyond trying to impress anyone with credentialed advisors. So, appoint a hack who hangs around for 2.5 years.
Susan Rice NSA 7-1-13 – 1-20-17
An even worse party hack than Donilon. Long-time Clinton flunky in the State Department. Wanted to be SoS but withdrew when she realized that her serial lies about Benghazi would surface, so scratch that.
Once again, dear leader didn't care because he didn't need confirmation and he was way, way beyond even thinking of trying to impress anyone with credentialed advisors. Give her the job, who cares?
Anyone will do when you don't really care about national security. Just leave it to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. If we're under attack, they'll let me know. Call me on the first tee, I got 18 to play.
Now, Flynn may have been a bit of a loose cannon, but I'd take him over the totally useless Donilon or Rice in a heartbeat.
General McMaster is the rough equivalent of General Jones, they have different strengths and talents, but I'd be happy with either of them.
We're privileged that General McMaster agreed to serve. And away we go with a great NSA appointment and another great Trump choice.
I'm no blind Trump follower. As long as he sticks to everything he promised and stays away from any tariff/protectionist baloney, I'm good.
So far, he's been far better than I expected, both in terms of appointments and such action as he's been able to take on his own.
FORUM GUIDELINES: Please review the guidelines below before posting at WOODWEB's Interactive Message Boards(return to top)
WOODWEB is a professional industrial woodworking site. Hobbyist and homeowner woodworking questions are inappropriate.
Messages should be kept reasonably short and on topic, relating to the focus of the forum. Responses should relate to the original question.
A valid email return address must be included with each message.
Advertising is inappropriate. The only exceptions are the Classified Ads Exchange, Machinery Exchange, Lumber Exchange, and Job Opportunities and Services Exchange. When posting listings in these areas, review the posting instructions carefully.
Subject lines may be edited for length and clarity.
"Cross posting" is not permitted. Choose the best forum for your question, and post your question at one forum only.
Messages requesting private responses will be removed - Forums are designed to provide information and assistance for all of our visitors. Private response requests are appropriate at WOODWEB's Exchanges and Job Opportunities and Services.
Messages that accuse businesses or individuals of alleged negative actions or behavior are inappropriate since WOODWEB is unable to verify or substantiate the claims.
Posts with the intent of soliciting answers to surveys are not appropriate. Contact WOODWEB for more information on initiating a survey.
Excessive forum participation by an individual upsets the balance of a healthy forum atmosphere. Individuals who excessively post responses containing marginal content will be considered repeat forum abusers.
Responses that initiate or support inappropriate and off-topic discussion of general politics detract from the professional woodworking focus of WOODWEB, and will be removed.
Participants are encouraged to use their real name when posting. Intentionally using another persons name is prohibited, and posts of this nature will be removed at WOODWEB's discretion.
Carefully review your message before clicking on the "Send Message" button - you will not be able to revise the message once it has been sent.
You will be notified of responses to the message(s) you posted via email. Be sure to enter your email address correctly.
WOODWEB's forums are a highly regarded resource for professional woodworkers. Messages and responses that are crafted in a professional and civil manner strengthen this resource. Messages that do not reflect a professional tone reduce the value of our forums.
Messages are inappropriate when their content: is deemed libelous in nature or is based on rumor, fails to meet basic standards of decorum, contains blatant advertising or inappropriate emphasis on self promotion (return to top).
Libel: Posts which defame an individual or organization, or employ a tone which can be viewed as malicious in nature. Words, pictures, or cartoons which expose a person or organization to public hatred, shame, disgrace, or ridicule, or induce an ill opinion of a person or organization, are libelous.
Improper Decorum: Posts which are profane, inciting, disrespectful or uncivil in tone, or maliciously worded. This also includes the venting of unsubstantiated opinions. Such messages do little to illuminate a given topic, and often have the opposite effect. Constructive criticism is acceptable (return to top).
Advertising: The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not an advertising venue. Companies participating in a Forum discussion should provide specific answers to posted questions. WOODWEB suggests that businesses include an appropriately crafted signature in order to identify their company. A well meaning post that seems to be on-topic but contains a product reference may do your business more harm than good in the Forum environment. Forum users may perceive your references to specific products as unsolicited advertising (spam) and consciously avoid your web site or services. A well-crafted signature is an appropriate way to advertise your services that will not offend potential customers. Signatures should be limited to 4-6 lines, and may contain information that identifies the type of business you're in, your URL and email address (return to top).
Repeated Forum Abuse:
Forum participants who repeatedly fail to follow WOODWEB's Forum Guidelines may encounter difficulty when attempting to post messages.
There are often situations when the original message asks for opinions: "What is the best widget for my type of shop?". To a certain extent, the person posting the message is responsible for including specific questions within the message. An open ended question (like the one above) invites responses that may read as sales pitches. WOODWEB suggests that companies responding to such a question provide detailed and substantive replies rather than responses that read as a one-sided product promotion. It has been WOODWEB's experience that substantive responses are held in higher regard by our readers (return to top).
The staff of WOODWEB assume no responsibility for the accuracy, content, or outcome of any posting transmitted at WOODWEB's Message Boards. Participants should undertake the use of machinery, materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB's Message Boards after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages it deems inappropriate. (return to top)
Forum Posting Form Guidelines
The name you enter in this field will be the name that appears with your post or response (return to form).
Personal or business website links must point to the author's website. Inappropriate links will be removed without notice, and at WOODWEB's sole discretion. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
Your e-mail address will not be publicly viewable. Forum participants will be able to contact you using a contact link (included with your post) that is substituted for your actual address. You must include a valid email address in this field. (return to form)
Subject may be edited for length and clarity. Subject lines should provide an indication of the content of your post. (return to form)
Thread Related Link and Image Guidelines
Thread Related Links posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should point to locations that provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related Link that directs visitors to an area with inappropriate content will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
Thread Related File Uploads
Thread Related Files posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. Video Files: acceptable video formats are: .MOV .AVI .WMV .MPEG .MPG .FLV .MP4 (Image Upload Tips) If you encounter any difficulty when uploading video files, E-mail WOODWEB for assistance. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related File that contains inappropriate content will be removed, and uploaded files that are not directly related to the message thread will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links, files, or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
The editors, writers, and staff at WOODWEB try to promote safe practices.
What is safe for one woodworker under certain conditions may not be safe
for others in different circumstances. Readers should undertake the use
of materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB after considerate evaluation,
and at their own risk.