Sawing and Drying

You are not logged in. [ Login ] Why log in
(NOTE: Login is not required to post)

Post a Response
The staff at WOODWEB assume no responsibility for the accuracy, content, or outcome of any posting transmitted at any WOODWEB Forum. Participants should undertake the use of machinery, materials and methods discussed after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk.
Your Name:
Your Website:
Email Address:
Subject:

Message:

(read message guidelines).
Note: Do not use the below fields to advertise your business - only for links related to the discussion.
Thread Related Link URL:
Thread Related Link Title:
  To "point" to an image (picture) from another website, provide the URL (Web Address) of the file ( include ONE reference to http:// )
Thread Related Image URL:

Date of your Birth:

Upload a Thread Related File:
File Types: Image (gif-jpg-png-bmp), PDF, Sketchup, Video (mov avi wmv mpeg mpg mp4 ogg). (Image Upload Tips)

I have read the Site User Agreement and agree with the Terms

  <= Check to receive e-mail notification of responses

Message Thread:

RE: Better blades producing less sawdust

4/8/15       
Ken Member

We have a sawmill with 30” wheels, which uses band blades that are 1.5 inches wide, with a 1” tooth spacing, .050 thick, and is approximately 20 feet long.

Is there a better blade than a 1.5” wide that would make less sawdust and more wood?

Our logs average between 20” to 26” in diameter, and is mostly red oak and maple.

4/8/15       #2: RE: Better blades producing less sa ...
Gene Wengert-Wood Doc

I would say "No!" but it is not a firm "No."

Background: We need a certain thickness of the blade so that we can apply tension and so that when we hit a knot, the blade will not break. Further, we need the teeth to cut a little bit wider than the blade thickness so that the saw will not run. Note that when we cut wood, some of the wood cells are compressed slightly and then immediately springback. So, without any set to the teeth, the blade will be tight. But we do not want too cut too wide either...but too wide is better than too narrow in spots.

You specifically ask about the 1.5" width. The wider the blade, the less likely that the blade will wander...that is, the back steers the blade. However, a narrow blade can bend front to back more easily (absorbs the energy) rather than side to side, so overall a narrow blade often cuts more accurately.

You can get a blade, and may already have one, that leaves a very smooth surface on the lumber. This means less planer allowance is needed, which in turn means that you can reduce your green thickness slightly. Further, with a blade that runs true and cool due to excellent sharpening and mill set-up, you will have less variation in thickness due to the saw blade variations. Overall, an excellent blade could save 1/16" in green target, which is roughly 5% increased yield for 4/4.

Having said all this, it is exciting and unusual to have someone ask a question about yield and efficiency, rather than production speed. Keep thinking in this way.

4/24/15       #3: RE: Better blades producing less sa ...
Dave Boyt  Member

Website: http://www.norwoodsawmills.com

What species are you milling? Some, such as cottonwood, need a wider kerf (more set to the teeth). A .042 thickness would save you a bit of thickness, but possibly not as straight-cutting as the .050 blade. Gene's observation that there is more to efficient milling than the smallest possible pile of sawdust is exactly right. Sharpening & setting are the most important factors. When cutting flooring, I was allowed to bring in boards 1-1/16" thick instead of the usual 1-1/8", because they were so smooth & straight. I got more boards & their planer didn't have to hog off as much wood. Look at it this way: the most you can hope to save with the thinner blade & narrower set is maybe 0.010", but a1/16" thinner allowance is .062".

5/2/15       #4: RE: Better blades producing less sa ...
Tom the Sawyer  Member

Website: http://www.TomTheSawyer.net

Ken,
An interesting question and, depending on how it is pondered, there are several approaches to an answer - as Dave and Gene have mentioned.

From a sawdust production standpoint, theoretically the volume of material removed would be equal to the surface measure of the cant x the width of the kerf. Consider a cant 12' wide and 10' long - a surface measure of 10 sq.ft. (1440 sq.in.). If using a .042 blade with a set of .022, the kerf would .086 (.042+.022+.022) and a pass through that cant would remove 123.84 cu.in. of material (sawdust) although 'fluffed up' the volume would be slightly more. If using a blade with a .014 set then the kerf would be .070 and remove 100.8 cu.in. (18.6% less) per pass.

Of course, that is assuming a dead flat cut, any flexing or flutter would increase the kerf with an increase in volume removed. So, it would seem that the least amount of set that would perform up to your expectations would be the way to go if you want to reduce the amount of sawdust. The width of the blade shouldn't affect the quantity of sawdust. The thickness would have less impact than the set.

Perhaps, much ado about nothing.

 

Buy & Sell Exchanges | Forums | Galleries | Site Map

FORUM GUIDELINES: Please review the guidelines below before posting at WOODWEB's Interactive Message Boards (return to top)

  • WOODWEB is a professional industrial woodworking site. Hobbyist and homeowner woodworking questions are inappropriate.
  • Messages should be kept reasonably short and on topic, relating to the focus of the forum. Responses should relate to the original question.
  • A valid email return address must be included with each message.
  • Advertising is inappropriate. The only exceptions are the Classified Ads Exchange, Machinery Exchange, Lumber Exchange, and Job Opportunities and Services Exchange. When posting listings in these areas, review the posting instructions carefully.
  • Subject lines may be edited for length and clarity.
  • "Cross posting" is not permitted. Choose the best forum for your question, and post your question at one forum only.
  • Messages requesting private responses will be removed - Forums are designed to provide information and assistance for all of our visitors. Private response requests are appropriate at WOODWEB's Exchanges and Job Opportunities and Services.
  • Messages that accuse businesses or individuals of alleged negative actions or behavior are inappropriate since WOODWEB is unable to verify or substantiate the claims.
  • Posts with the intent of soliciting answers to surveys are not appropriate. Contact WOODWEB for more information on initiating a survey.
  • Excessive forum participation by an individual upsets the balance of a healthy forum atmosphere. Individuals who excessively post responses containing marginal content will be considered repeat forum abusers.
  • Responses that initiate or support inappropriate and off-topic discussion of general politics detract from the professional woodworking focus of WOODWEB, and will be removed.
  • Participants are encouraged to use their real name when posting. Intentionally using another persons name is prohibited, and posts of this nature will be removed at WOODWEB's discretion.
  • Comments, questions, or criticisms regarding Forum policies should be directed to WOODWEB's Systems Administrator
    (return to top).

    Carefully review your message before clicking on the "Send Message" button - you will not be able to revise the message once it has been sent.

    You will be notified of responses to the message(s) you posted via email. Be sure to enter your email address correctly.

    WOODWEB's forums are a highly regarded resource for professional woodworkers. Messages and responses that are crafted in a professional and civil manner strengthen this resource. Messages that do not reflect a professional tone reduce the value of our forums.

    Messages are inappropriate when their content: is deemed libelous in nature or is based on rumor, fails to meet basic standards of decorum, contains blatant advertising or inappropriate emphasis on self promotion (return to top).

    Libel:   Posts which defame an individual or organization, or employ a tone which can be viewed as malicious in nature. Words, pictures, or cartoons which expose a person or organization to public hatred, shame, disgrace, or ridicule, or induce an ill opinion of a person or organization, are libelous.

    Improper Decorum:   Posts which are profane, inciting, disrespectful or uncivil in tone, or maliciously worded. This also includes the venting of unsubstantiated opinions. Such messages do little to illuminate a given topic, and often have the opposite effect. Constructive criticism is acceptable (return to top).

    Advertising:   The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not an advertising venue. Companies participating in a Forum discussion should provide specific answers to posted questions. WOODWEB suggests that businesses include an appropriately crafted signature in order to identify their company. A well meaning post that seems to be on-topic but contains a product reference may do your business more harm than good in the Forum environment. Forum users may perceive your references to specific products as unsolicited advertising (spam) and consciously avoid your web site or services. A well-crafted signature is an appropriate way to advertise your services that will not offend potential customers. Signatures should be limited to 4-6 lines, and may contain information that identifies the type of business you're in, your URL and email address (return to top).

    Repeated Forum Abuse: Forum participants who repeatedly fail to follow WOODWEB's Forum Guidelines may encounter difficulty when attempting to post messages.

    There are often situations when the original message asks for opinions: "What is the best widget for my type of shop?". To a certain extent, the person posting the message is responsible for including specific questions within the message. An open ended question (like the one above) invites responses that may read as sales pitches. WOODWEB suggests that companies responding to such a question provide detailed and substantive replies rather than responses that read as a one-sided product promotion. It has been WOODWEB's experience that substantive responses are held in higher regard by our readers (return to top).

    The staff of WOODWEB assume no responsibility for the accuracy, content, or outcome of any posting transmitted at WOODWEB's Message Boards. Participants should undertake the use of machinery, materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB's Message Boards after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages it deems inappropriate. (return to top)


  • Forum Posting Help
    Your Name The name you enter in this field will be the name that appears with your post or response (return to form).
    Your Website Personal or business website links must point to the author's website. Inappropriate links will be removed without notice, and at WOODWEB's sole discretion. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    E-Mail Address Your e-mail address will not be publicly viewable. Forum participants will be able to contact you using a contact link (included with your post) that is substituted for your actual address. You must include a valid email address in this field. (return to form)
    Subject Subject may be edited for length and clarity. Subject lines should provide an indication of the content of your post. (return to form)
    Thread Related Link and Image Guidelines Thread Related Links posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should point to locations that provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related Link that directs visitors to an area with inappropriate content will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)
    Thread Related File Uploads Thread Related Files posted at WOODWEB's Forums and Exchanges should provide supporting information for the topic being discussed in the current message thread. Video Files: acceptable video formats are: .MOV .AVI .WMV .MPEG .MPG .MP4 (Image Upload Tips)   If you encounter any difficulty when uploading video files, E-mail WOODWEB for assistance. The purpose of WOODWEB Forums is to provide answers, not to serve as an advertising venue. A Thread Related File that contains inappropriate content will be removed, and uploaded files that are not directly related to the message thread will be removed. WOODWEB reserves the right to delete any messages with links, files, or images it deems inappropriate. (return to form)