Shopping for a Cup Gun

      A finisher who is used to air-assisted airless equipment gets advice on choosing a cup gun or turbine setup for small projects. June 16, 2014

Question (WOODWEB Member) :
I'm finding it hard to purchase a gravity feed cup gun to spray conversion varnish on some furniture I build for myself when all I ever used to finish with is air assisted airless systems. Can you get a high build look? Are there limits to big sizes of furniture with high detail that would be out of the question to use a cup gun? Would a compliant be better than HVLP for spraying solvent based clears? I know the AAA's are really nice but I would like to hear from those who have experience with spraying with cup guns.

Forum Responses
(Finishing Forum)
From contributor N:
There are lots of good guns out there but be prepared to pay $200-$700 for a good (or very good) one. I use a Binks M1G with the 93P aircap and a 1.4 nozzle for CV and it sprays CV coat for coat with my AAA with a 411. It's slower but three coats look identical. I've sprayed some big pieces with one but it really shines using it on that one small piece of furniture, tabletop or two doors and a piece of scribe that you forgot when you were spraying with the pump. I can cook up as little as a 1/2 pint of CV so little to no waste for those last minute small or forgotten pieces. Spraying overhead horizontal pieces can be a problem, a problem that can be solved using one of the many disposable cup systems out there. HVLP or compliant makes little difference (I have a compliant Devilbiss that I use for WB). Most HVLP guns need more volume (CFM) than their counter part compliant guns.

If you don't have experience with a pneumatic gun expect there to be a learning curve. Finding that sweet spot of air pressure and material flow (your compressor must be able to deliver the CFM that the gun requires too) can be elusive in the beginning and of course keeping the gun clean is necessary for it to work perfectly. When you do get it dialed in the quality of finish that can be achieved with one is second to none.



From the original questioner:
I would have to say I have little to no experience with using a pneumatic gun so it would be a learning curve. I'm glad to hear that I could achieve the same results, and really like the factor of minimal waste with the cup guns.


From contributor F:
I come from a different perspective. I was born and raised with conventional guns so pressure pots, siphon and gravity feed guns remain my preferred method of application. Yes, I have used AAA systems and while I can see their advantages in some areas I never became a convert because I never really got used to spraying with the sharp angular spray pattern, tails when they get clogged, horribly expensive replacement parts and lack of adjustability inherent in the system.

To me it just comes down to personal preference and the fact is, a good finisher should be able to lay down a beautiful finish with any type of gun if he knows how to adjust him material, equipment and spraying technique. I have a number of guns but if I could choose only one it would be my trusty old Devilbiss JGA 510 with a 1.8 fluid tip and #30 air cap. I like a big fluid tip because I have always held the belief that it's easier to turn down a gun that sprays wet than to turn up a gun that sprays light. I know it may not have the best transfer efficiency but it lays down a nice wet coat with great adjustability. From dyes to CV and 2K Urethanes I have not found many materials that I can't spray with this gun.



From the original questioner:
AAA systems have their place when high volume is demanded but high quality finishes had to be achievable before those systems were on the market. I think the pneumatic guns would be sufficient for what I'm doing.


From contributor J:
I have two AAA systems, a four stage turbine and probably a dozen or so cup guns. The AAA works great for production runs and big items but they are also not as great if you are spraying smaller pieces or if you are changing colors, etc. I have one set up for solvent based clear coats and one set up that sprays water based clears and pigmented finishes.

For smaller pieces like furniture, etc. I will use the turbine or cup guns. The turbine combined with an Accuspray 10 GP gives me results that are every bit as good as the AAA. I would use that as a primary gun in a second if I was spraying less than a quart of product at a time. The drawback comes from having to stop and refill the cup during the job while with the AAA you just drop the pickup tube in and spray five gallons without having to stop. The gravity guns run off the compressor also serve a purpose such as for small runs like when we have multiple vanities in a house that are all different colors where we can set up multiple PPS equipped guns and not have to constantly change over. That takes a decent compressor to run. If I had to choose one single thing to spray with I would probably take the turbine and the Model 10 gun. That gives the absolute best combination of finish quality, portability and performance. Obviously everyone is different and so are the needs.



From contributor T:
The shop I work in already has two Kremlin's in it. Agree 100 % with Contributor F in terms of cost for replacement parts, etc. I just bought a bag of tipseals at $36/pack of ten. Individual tips are $94.00 each for an 09-114. We do a lot of large kitchens and whole house cabinetry for our parent company which does custom homes at the beach. You will not beat an AAA as far as speed and volume when spraying 120' of wainscot panels, refrigerator side panels, 8' tall pantries, etc. It all works well when you are cat'g two gallons at a time. It is totally inappropriate for small projects, color samples and one-offs.

I myself use two SATA's ($420 each) with 1.4 tips, one for clear one for pigments. I also have my pig-gun aka a Devilbiss FLG-3 ($225) which is set-up with a 1.8 tip for prime-time. The SATA's are nice and light for prolonged spraying - their finish is superior to the Devilbiss. I also have an old Binks #7 cup gun for those days when I know I won't be able to get to the gym (any old-time finisher would understand that statement.) All guns are gravity-fed and set-up with 3M PPS necks for that system. With the PPS, I use the 6oz. and 22oz. cups. The 6 oz is used for touch-ups and color samples.

And finally, I just bought a Devilbiss FLG-4 on line for my apprentice to learn on. That gun came in at $275, but comes with a 1.3, 1.5, 1.8 and a 2.2 tip, so that will cover just about any product you can think of spraying.



Would you like to add information to this article?
Interested in writing or submitting an article?
Have a question about this article?


Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below?
  • KnowledgeBase: Knowledge Base

  • KnowledgeBase: Finishing

  • KnowledgeBase: Finishing: General Wood Finishing


    Would you like to add information to this article? ... Click Here

    If you have a question regarding a Knowledge Base article, your best chance at uncovering an answer is to search the entire Knowledge Base for related articles or to post your question at the appropriate WOODWEB Forum. Before posting your message, be sure to
    review our Forum Guidelines.

    Questions entered in the Knowledge Base Article comment form will not generate responses! A list of WOODWEB Forums can be found at WOODWEB's Site Map.

    When you post your question at the Forum, be sure to include references to the Knowledge Base article that inspired your question. The more information you provide with your question, the better your chances are of receiving responses.

    Return to beginning of article.



    Refer a Friend || Read This Important Information || Site Map || Privacy Policy || Site User Agreement

    Letters, questions or comments? E-Mail us and let us know what you think. Be sure to review our Frequently Asked Questions page.

    Contact us to discuss advertising or to report problems with this site.

    To report a problem, send an e-mail to our Webmaster

    Copyright © 1996-2016 - WOODWEB ® Inc.
    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any manner without permission of the Editor.
    Review WOODWEB's Copyright Policy.

    The editors, writers, and staff at WOODWEB try to promote safe practices. What is safe for one woodworker under certain conditions may not be safe for others in different circumstances. Readers should undertake the use of materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk.

    WOODWEB, Inc.
    335 Bedell Road
    Montrose, PA 18801

    Contact WOODWEB











  • WOODWEB - the leading resource for professional woodworkers


      Home » Knowledge Base » Knowledge Base Article