Three-Legged Pedestal Table Leg Proportions
From the original questioner:
I'm raising the question here more for my own design purposes rather than my client's. I want to make sure that the leg length I choose for this table will be adequate for the design height and diameter of the table. If anyone is aware of a standard or rule of thumb, I'd like to know about it.
From contributor R:
In that case, I typically look for historic answers. Check out a couple on antique or auction websites. Tables with undersized legs don't last 100 plus years.
From contributor S:
If you draw to scale the three legs superimposed over your 32" top and just pick a length, you will see that the ensuing triangle you make has to come near the rim of the table to give any semblance of stability. This makes for interference with chairs and people legs if this table is for people. This is why you will not find historical versions of this design. Four leg pedestals can be found. But three makes for a disproportional extension of the foot compared to four. If this table is not for seating people, then it is a moot point, but drawing it in plan and elevation will give enough preview info to size as needed. The little Shaker three legged candlestands have the classic footprint to top ratio, and may translate to 32" diameter - but even these are tippy and tend towards top-heavy.
From contributor P:
Each leg extending 14" from center should do the trick. That puts about 2/3 of the area of the top on the right side of the "tip line" formed by drawing a chord connecting two of the legs. It's counterintuitive, but the heavier the top is the more stable this table will be - it's most likely to tip if someone leans on the edge point furthest from the line connecting two legs. The weight of the top serves to counterbalance the weight on the edge, so the heavier the top the better. Draw it in CAD and you'll see what I mean.
Would you like to add information to this article?
Interested in writing or submitting an article?
Have a question about this article?
Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below?