Beam Saw Versus Sliding Table Saw
You also have the ability to link software to the beam saw depending on make/model of the beam saw which can help with your yield and time spent optimizing your panels. I also think that beam saws are safer than sliding table saws since the beam saw has a blade(s) that travels in an area that is semi-concealed. A beam saw may limit the size of panel you need to cut whereas typically with a few steps you can cut very large panels on sliders.
Beam saws do have a lot more parts than sliders. You have valves, cylinders, PLC's, switches, etc. and you will find that some of these will need replacing more often than you may like. When we first purchased our beam saw we contemplated on getting rid of our slider. We decided to keep the slider and we have not regretted it to this day.
From contributor C:
Don't forget the parts that can cost between $200 and $1000 (in a beam saw) for a part and until replaced will completely stop production.
From contributor R:
I’d go for a good slider for the versatility. Beamsaws are expensive to maintain because they are complex. You will get 4 or 5% better yield with a beamsaw and optimization software plus being able to cut more sheets per day especially if you are stack cutting.
Some of the older beam saws are pretty slow, don’t have clamps (operator must be very careful,) and the cables that move with the saw are subject to flex wear and are expensive to replace. (We just had them replaced on our Schelling along with a little other tuning up by the technician - $9,000±.) We also have our trusty old SCM SL16 that is still used for lots of odds and end work. Much of what the Schelling used to do has been taken over by running nested on a Komo CNC router.
Would you like to add information to this article?
Interested in writing or submitting an article?
Have a question about this article?
Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below?