Checking Tolerances on a CNC Router

      When parts are coming out slightly undersized, start with a few basic troubleshooting checks. October 20, 2013

Question
(WOODWEB Member):
We have a Multi-cam router running with Alpha-cam software. The router is cutting .015 smaller on a geometry than it should be. If I have a 12"X12" square and rout with a new 3/8 bit, my result in both X and Y is .03+- smaller in dimension. The pinion gears in X have been re-seated with no effect. Since I get the same variation in both X and Y I am thinking this is not wear and tear on our 12 year old machine. I have been told that it may be a "resolution problem." Any similar problems out there? What was the fix?

Forum Responses
(CNC Forum)
From contributor D:
Silly question, but what is the diameter of the bit? If it measures 0.375, take a single straight cut and measure the width of the cut. That will at least eliminate tooling. Unlikely I know, but you'll feel really stupid if you chase this for 3 days and find out it's the router bit. Don't ask how I know...



From contributor N:
I have done that with both re-sharpened bits and new bits, checking for proper diameter and possible run out. Bits check out with correct diameter and little to no run out. Still at a loss. My poor engineer is having to compensate all parts by .015 now.


From contributor B:
Just a shot here - are you conventional cutting (counter clockwise) around the part? If so, try cutting your test square in the opposite direction (clockwise - climb cut) and see if the dimensions grow by 0.030" instead.

From contributor V

Click to View Member Profile Member Contact Info Project Gallery Shop Built Equipment Gallery Categories

Contributor B is correct. The first thing to check after confirming the bit diameter is deflection in the system. If you are conventional cutting and there is some Z-axis play due to wear and tear, that would account for the undersized part. If it is indeed a deflection issue, your part should come out .03" oversize on a climb cut.


From contributor D:
Also, check if the error is different on different size parts, i.e. 0.030 on a 24" part and 0.0075 on a 6" part.


From contributor M:
In addition to the above, validate the output Gcode.


From the original questioner:
In doing test cuts, I routed two 12" X 12" squares, one in each direction. The square climb cutting seemed to be just slightly larger than the normal forward cut. I have not checked the g code but will do so. Thanks for all the input on this.

Would you like to add information to this article?
Interested in writing or submitting an article?
Have a question about this article?


Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below?
  • KnowledgeBase: Knowledge Base

  • KnowledgeBase: Computerization

  • KnowledgeBase: Computerization: CNC Machinery and Techniques


    Would you like to add information to this article? ... Click Here

    If you have a question regarding a Knowledge Base article, your best chance at uncovering an answer is to search the entire Knowledge Base for related articles or to post your question at the appropriate WOODWEB Forum. Before posting your message, be sure to
    review our Forum Guidelines.

    Questions entered in the Knowledge Base Article comment form will not generate responses! A list of WOODWEB Forums can be found at WOODWEB's Site Map.

    When you post your question at the Forum, be sure to include references to the Knowledge Base article that inspired your question. The more information you provide with your question, the better your chances are of receiving responses.

    Return to beginning of article.



    Refer a Friend || Read This Important Information || Site Map || Privacy Policy || Site User Agreement

    Letters, questions or comments? E-Mail us and let us know what you think. Be sure to review our Frequently Asked Questions page.

    Contact us to discuss advertising or to report problems with this site.

    To report a problem, send an e-mail to our Webmaster

    Copyright © 1996-2016 - WOODWEB ® Inc.
    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any manner without permission of the Editor.
    Review WOODWEB's Copyright Policy.

    The editors, writers, and staff at WOODWEB try to promote safe practices. What is safe for one woodworker under certain conditions may not be safe for others in different circumstances. Readers should undertake the use of materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk.

    WOODWEB, Inc.
    335 Bedell Road
    Montrose, PA 18801

    Contact WOODWEB











  • WOODWEB - the leading resource for professional woodworkers


      Home » Knowledge Base » Knowledge Base Article