Compression Bit Size: What's Best
Half-inch bits run faster, but the 3/8-inch size wastes less. April 10, 2005
Question
We currently run 1/2" mortise compression tooling as our main cut out tool on an Onsrud CNC. We are primarily cutting particle board core melamines at 750 inches per minute. We are looking at changing to 3/8" tooling. I'm wondering what everybody else is using and the pros and cons of 1/2 versus 3/8 inch tooling. Also, if you are using 3/8 tooling, what kinds of cut speed are you maintaining?
Forum Responses
(CNC Forum)
From contributor A:
I'm using 3/8" 2 flute compression for nested cabinet parts, mostly pre finished plywood but some melamine. We run at 18000 rpm and at 750 inches per minute, getting about 60 sheets per bit.
From contributor B:
For that tool and rpm, increase your feed rate to 1260 IPM and you will see a larger sheet count per tool.
From contributor A:
Would quality of cut suffer at all? What do you base your recommendation on?
From contributor C:
Most firms that have switched to a .375 compression are doing for yield purposes. With a .375 tool you are losing about 10-20 sheets worth of cutting. As the gullets are smaller than the .500, chip evacuation is not as great. Also when servicing these tools, the maximum services are 10% of the diameter, meaning 1-2 fewer sharpenings. On 3/4" material 750IPM at 18000 RPMs are OK on the .375 tool.
From contributor D:
I would think about this very seriously before switching. You will be able to run a higher feed rate with the 1/2" bits. The yield will be lower with the bigger bits.
From contributor E:
Flip a coin - they'll both work great at those feeds and speeds. The only viable reasons for switching are material utilization and yield or for a little better parts holding. The 3/8 opens less kerf and thus you lose less vacuum through it. With the 40HP pump you guys have, that's probably not a compelling reason to switch.
The comments below were added after this Forum discussion was archived as a Knowledge Base article (add your comment).
Comment from contributor F:
I switched from 1/2 to 3/8 a year ago. I cut mostly 5/8 melamine, and I find that I can run just as fast if I do not re-adjust the speed. I have a lot less waste and bags to empty.
Would you like to add information to this article?
Interested in writing or submitting an article?
Have a question about this article?
Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below?
KnowledgeBase: Knowledge Base
KnowledgeBase: Computerization
KnowledgeBase: Computerization: CNC Machinery and Techniques
KnowledgeBase: Laminates and Solid Surfacing
KnowledgeBase: Laminates & Solid Surfacing: Fabrication Techniques
Would you like to add information to this article? ...
Click Here
If you have a question regarding a Knowledge Base article, your best chance at uncovering an answer is to search the entire Knowledge Base for related articles or to post your question at the appropriate WOODWEB Forum. Before posting your message, be sure to review our Forum Guidelines.
Questions entered in the Knowledge Base Article comment form will not generate responses! A list of WOODWEB Forums can be found at WOODWEB's Site Map.
When you post your question at the Forum, be sure to include references to the Knowledge Base article that inspired your question. The more information you provide with your question, the better your chances are of receiving responses.
Return to beginning of article.
|
