Dadoes and Plywood Thickness Variation

      Dimensional variation in plywood can cause trouble with dadoes. Cabinetmakers in this thread offer ways to handle the problem. September 22, 2005

I'm doing a project that requires about 50 sheets of 3/4" oak veneer plywood, and there are a lot of dados involved. This raises the question of thickness variation in the plywood, sheet-to-sheet, and within the same sheet to get tight fitting dado joints consistently.

I'd always been told that (1) there is not much variation within a single sheet, provided you've purchased high enough quality plywood, (2) not too much sheet-to-sheet thickness variation within the same pallet of plywood, and (3) a completely unknown variation in thickness pallet-to-pallet. I'd like to know if anyone out there can tell me what to extent, or point me in the direction of the forum/knowledge base article that talks about this.

Forum Responses
(Cabinetmaking Forum)
From contributor R:
I developed my own system for joining sheatgood 18 years ago because of the thickness difference issue. I have since then used a simple butt joint incorporating a 1/4" x 1/2" continuous spline to lock the parts together. It's a joint easy to do with a tablesaw and router, or if you have it, a 1/4" groover on a shaper. You make a 1/4" x 1/4" dado in the face of your panels and a 1/4" x 1/4" groove in the edge of the partitions and fixed shelves, glue the spline in and assemble with clamps and cauls, screws or nails. This eliminates this constant fitting problem you have described and it's a very strong joint.

From contributor L:
What I do for a tight fit dado is make the dado as small as or smaller than the thinnest sheet of plywood. Then using a tablesaw I run the thickness of the plywood through so the piece will fit in the dado groove tightly. You only have to make the saw cut as tall as the dado is deep. I use a 5/8" router bit and then cut the edge of the plywood to 5/8" thick and it makes for a nice fit throughout the job. Here is a drawing of it below.

"Drawing by Leo R Graywacz Jr".

From contributor M:
I would suggest takling to your supplier and see what they consider an acceptable variation. I primarily use Russian birch and have had variations from .715 to .6875 from unit to unit (more than 1/32"). I think these guys are on the right track. Don't worry too much about the variations for dados. Just use a joint that is not relying on the thickness. These are two good examples of many.

You will need to keep in mind that tolerances creep. An additional 16 1/64" will add up to 1/4". If you dado, and there is a variation in the thickness of your sheets, your dado depth may be correct, but your overall width will be off. 8 units with and additional 1/64 = 1/4", 16 = 1/2", and so on. When you are dealing with this may pieces, take many readings and average. The more numbers in your sample, the more accurate you will get.

From contributor C:
You might want to check the knowledge base. Jon Elvrum wrote a very good article that addresses why dadoes are completely unnecessary in casework from sheet goods. If you were to adopt the approach he presents, the problem will solved once and for all.

Would you like to add information to this article?
Interested in writing or submitting an article?
Have a question about this article?

Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below?
  • KnowledgeBase: Knowledge Base

  • KnowledgeBase: Cabinetmaking

  • KnowledgeBase: Cabinetmaking: Custom Cabinet Construction

    Would you like to add information to this article? ... Click Here

    If you have a question regarding a Knowledge Base article, your best chance at uncovering an answer is to search the entire Knowledge Base for related articles or to post your question at the appropriate WOODWEB Forum. Before posting your message, be sure to
    review our Forum Guidelines.

    Questions entered in the Knowledge Base Article comment form will not generate responses! A list of WOODWEB Forums can be found at WOODWEB's Site Map.

    When you post your question at the Forum, be sure to include references to the Knowledge Base article that inspired your question. The more information you provide with your question, the better your chances are of receiving responses.

    Return to beginning of article.

    Refer a Friend || Read This Important Information || Site Map || Privacy Policy || Site User Agreement

    Letters, questions or comments? E-Mail us and let us know what you think. Be sure to review our Frequently Asked Questions page.

    Contact us to discuss advertising or to report problems with this site.

    To report a problem, send an e-mail to our Webmaster

    Copyright © 1996-2017 - WOODWEB ® Inc.
    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any manner without permission of the Editor.
    Review WOODWEB's Copyright Policy.

    The editors, writers, and staff at WOODWEB try to promote safe practices. What is safe for one woodworker under certain conditions may not be safe for others in different circumstances. Readers should undertake the use of materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk.

    WOODWEB, Inc.
    335 Bedell Road
    Montrose, PA 18801

    Contact WOODWEB

  • WOODWEB - the leading resource for professional woodworkers

      Home » Knowledge Base » Knowledge Base Article