Depth Variations: Is It the Code?

      Inconsistent machining is probably a mechanical issue, not a code or controller fault. December 10, 2007

Question
I have encountered a problem processing shapes to G-code using Microvellum. The products in the Microvellum library process and cut fine, but when I draw a shape using AutoCAD and process the code, using Microvellum's post processor, the cut is deeper into the spoilboard, although the code is the same. Any ideas?

Forum Responses
(CAD Forum)
From contributor S:
Open G-code file in the notepad, click edit ->find, type in Z- and hit enter. It will show you all negative Zs. Click Edit ->Replace, type your negative Z-s in find what box and type Z.0s in replace with. What CNC router are you using? How you probe?



From the original questioner:
We use a Weeke BHP20, WoodWop and AutoCAD/Microvellum, and we run a test program to set tool heights. The code generated is showing the Z at the right position. Ideally we cut .2mm into the spoilboard. The code, in both situations, reflects this (Z-0.2), but the actual depth of cut from one to the other is different, a lot different. Could it be an offset issue? Could it be that programs created solely with Microvellum use different position offsets (G54's) than a program created just using Microvellum's post-processor?


From contributor D:
I do know that there are two places that Microvellum checks the router clearance. One is in the globals under "machining general settings/general machining/router clearance." The other option is in the tool file; under the settings tab there's "spoil board penetration." Make sure those two settings are set the same.

As far as machining calibration, do you mean you use the BHP-200? Make sure into the soft keys that you have the proper selection for "spoilboard or pods."

I have found that Microvellum is usually not the culprit when it comes to depth errors or panel sizes slightly off. Most of our problems stemmed from the router calibrations.



From contributor J:
I agree with contributor D. If the code is the same, then you have a controller (not very likely) or a spoilboard flatness issue. This is a hard number business, so we need to know how much variation is "a lot." I have had up to 40 thou variation creep up at times with moisture, heat, thickness of spoilboard, etc. all being possibilities. I am not a Microvellum user, but the code tells the machining story.

Would you like to add information to this article?
Interested in writing or submitting an article?
Have a question about this article?


Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below?
  • KnowledgeBase: Knowledge Base

  • KnowledgeBase: Computerization

  • KnowledgeBase: Computerization: CNC Machinery and Techniques


    Would you like to add information to this article? ... Click Here

    If you have a question regarding a Knowledge Base article, your best chance at uncovering an answer is to search the entire Knowledge Base for related articles or to post your question at the appropriate WOODWEB Forum. Before posting your message, be sure to
    review our Forum Guidelines.

    Questions entered in the Knowledge Base Article comment form will not generate responses! A list of WOODWEB Forums can be found at WOODWEB's Site Map.

    When you post your question at the Forum, be sure to include references to the Knowledge Base article that inspired your question. The more information you provide with your question, the better your chances are of receiving responses.

    Return to beginning of article.



    Refer a Friend || Read This Important Information || Site Map || Privacy Policy || Site User Agreement

    Letters, questions or comments? E-Mail us and let us know what you think. Be sure to review our Frequently Asked Questions page.

    Contact us to discuss advertising or to report problems with this site.

    To report a problem, send an e-mail to our Webmaster

    Copyright © 1996-2018 - WOODWEB ® Inc.
    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any manner without permission of the Editor.
    Review WOODWEB's Copyright Policy.

    The editors, writers, and staff at WOODWEB try to promote safe practices. What is safe for one woodworker under certain conditions may not be safe for others in different circumstances. Readers should undertake the use of materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk.

    WOODWEB, Inc.
    335 Bedell Road
    Montrose, PA 18801

    Contact WOODWEB











  • WOODWEB - the leading resource for professional woodworkers


      Home » Knowledge Base » Knowledge Base Article