Extreme Drawer-Slide Extension
This desk calls for two 20" deep drawers underneath the desktop. There were a few big changes of design throughout the project, and I let the 20" drawers slip past my guard without thinking about hardware. The cabinets are only 24" deep, so even with 24" full extension runners, the drawers extend 24" - 12" = 1 foot past the edge of the desktop. It's actually even less with the drawer fronts. Unfortunately, almost everything is built already, and I can't really relocate the drawers. If I can't figure out a solution, I'm just going to make false fronts and scrap the drawers altogether.
So what I need is not only full-extension, but over-extension runners. The only such monster I've found online is made by a company called Chambrelan. Has anyone dealt with their products before? They appear to offer 150% over-extension runners made with four beams. So my drawer could pull out 36" with just a 24" deep cabinet. I haven't contacted them for prices yet, but I imagine they will be outrageous.
Has anyone run into this problem before? I thought of using two pairs of slides (mounted together via wooden blocks) per drawer, but I have serious doubts about both appearance and performance. The other idea was to make custom slides using two/three brass-plated rods per side and a whole bunch of linear pillow bearings (believe it or not, I happen to have such bearings lying around already, but not any brass rods).
I'd go with the over extension slides. I'd make a mockup of the double drawer slide with the wood blocks to see if it works and how cheesy it looks first, though. I'd be willing to bet that trying to make something will cost more than the Chambelan slides, but the research will help out future ideas, perhaps. It's your time and money and choosing the right option is your reputation.
You could attach one pair of slides to a runner board and then attach another set of slides from the runner board to the drawer box. You will loose another 2-1/2" in width if using a 3/4" runner board and 1/2"(Accuride) slides.
From the original questioner:
I'm glad to hear that my idea isn't way off base. I was mostly worried about the torque exerted by a large drawer onto 36" worth of sliding mechanisms. However, I just realized one option which will reduce that greatly. If I supplement my regular slides (20") with full-extension 12" slides, I can mount the 12" slides facing backwards. That is, when opened, they would slide into the cabinet, toward the back. Since I have a face frame, they would never even be seen. Additionally, they wouldn't eat up my drawer width by as much, since the 12" slides would be 100% inside the cabinet at all times. A 24" piece of hardwood would serve as a runner.
That way, when the drawer is out, the 12" slide is closed (so the wood runner sticks out by 12") and the 20" slide is open. When the drawer is in, the 12" slide is open (so the wood runner is inside the cabinet) and the 20" slide is closed. The torques will therefore be reasonable. The only drawback I can see is that I will have to disable the Blumatic self-closing feature of my slides, and install a magnetic latch.
The double slide deal will work. I've done it before and you can make it look not too cheesy. But, are you using wooden drawers? What about making wooden slides? You can do all the mounting options side, bottom, etc. and length and travel can be infinitely (almost) manipulated. The self-closing thing could be tricky.
How about making rollout shelves with 2" sides, heavy duty hardware, no fronts? Inside the shelf, install your undermounts and drawer as normal. Unfortunately, the interior drawer width and height will be affected.
From the original questioner:
I tried to look into the Chambrelan slides, but they do not have a US distribution line. They are based in France. They sell to 12 countries in Europe, plus Japan and Israel, but not the US.
The drawers are wood - maple interior with red oak fronts. I am planning on going with wooden runners, as was suggested. The main slides (which hook to the drawer) will be undermounts, and the smaller 12" slides will be side-mounts. It looks like I'll lose less than an inch per side (width-wise), plus the regular restrictions of any undermount slide.
Would you like to add information to this article?
Interested in writing or submitting an article?
Have a question about this article?
Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below?