|
|
Rounded-Over Ends at Window Butt Joints
Question
We have always left the joint edges square, as we have always supplied our windows untreated. We have never had any cracked painted joints. At present we think a flat joint would look nicer than a rounded joint, and we're finding it hard to come to terms with using rounds. We know that other joinery manufacturers still manufacture flat joints like us. The argument of rounded joints may stand up to the exterior side of a window or door, but what about the internal side? Does the internal side need to have rounded joints as well or could it be left square, as there are no weather elements directly hitting it? I have to arrive at a decision for this dilemma, as we have just started finishing our windows and we are ordering new tooling. Rounds or no rounds? Any comments would be appreciated please. Forum Responses
From contributor D: We changed our tooling over about ten years ago just because it saved a step - sanding the sashes after assembling. That lasted only a month, as none of the customers liked the look, and we've never had a customer request those rounds anyway, so we changed back and have never thought about it again. From contributor E: Joint rounding makes for a higher quality window or door and adds a few years to the finish life. Finish will always start to deteriorate at the cross joints. If you look at door and window cross joints after a few years, there is always some movement and unevenness also. Rounding masks this. Same thing with stacked rails. It looks funny if you have never seen it, but it is the perfect way to control wood movement in wide rails. I agree that it is not acceptable in a lot of historic work. All our insert tooling is made with removable, adjustable rounding or chamfering inserts so we can build to suit. I don’t know about the UK, but it is not widely used in the US. I find after I educate the customer about it, they like it. From the original questioner: The last three posts are an exact reflection of the discussions I have with my colleagues. I am personally in favour of the rounded joints for the same reasons as contributor E, but my colleagues are against them for the same reasons as N and D. I have made sure the tooling we are buying will have removable rounding cutters to give us the ability to have rounds or not. We will give the customer the choice, but I will be in favour of rounds. Our tooling man suggested filling the round with filler to make it flat as an alternative. Apparently a firm called Technos makes a special filler for this purpose. For this filler to work it would have to be flexible, otherwise it would just crack. I imagine mastic might work if the window is being painted.
From the original questioner: After doing a bit of spraying, I know why rounded edges are important. If runs in the paint are going to form, they usually form on the square unrounded edge. If the edges were rounded, this would give a more gradual gradient where the two surfaces meet so runs would be less likely, I guess. I have been told that runs form where the paint is uneven, so this would be true for sharp square edges. Has anyone else experienced this? Would you like to add information to this article? Interested in writing or submitting an article? Have a question about this article? Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below? 
|
