Troubleshooting Router Errors -- Hardware or Software?

      A CNC tech thought his machine's bad behavior was caused by mechanical adjustment problems, but it turned out to be bad numbers in the controller. Lesson learned. April 10, 2008

Question
I run a router shop for a boat builder here in Maine. Just replaced the worn pulleys and belts on both the X and Y axis on the machine as a matter of routine maintenance. No problem in machining prompted this, just noticeable wear on the pulleys. Having replaced these I now can not get the machine to repeat proven router programs involving routing any radius without error. For example, the task of routing a 1/4" deep dado in cherry, programmed for two equal depth passes with a 1/8" bit, yields very visible "shoulders" between the first pass and the second, yielding almost a 1/4" dado in extremes and, furthermore, a shoulder on the ID at the start and the OD of the end of the radius rout. Previous to the pulley/belt change, no problem. I have checked backlash on X and Y with a dial gauge and it is within a half a thou in an inch, so that is not an issue. Andi Stratos, new in 98, with Fanuc controller. Any ideas? Andi and my tech are puzzled and I need to get her up and running.

Forum Responses
(CNC Forum)
From contributor M:
For my benefit, please define what you meant by "worn" pulleys? Worn belts are typically defined by cracks, frays, damaged teeth or loss of elasticity.

To me, backlash may be present, but would have been a graduating presence for some time. Perhaps the combination of the belt/pulley change could have made an already existing issue more pronounced, but to me that is a rare occurrence.

Other considerations:
1.) Is the lack of repetition consistent? Always occurs in one direction or always occurs a specific amount?

2.) Have you removed all covers from the associated pulleys/belts and physically watched them run at both rapid and cutting feed rates? I would look for noticeable run out. The pulley would seem to run with a wobble or as if it is eccentric if there was a problem with the mounting. The belt will ride to one side or slide back and forth over the pulley if mounted incorrectly. Any of the above are not desirable, as they increase the chance of you jumping teeth on the pulley belt.

3.) Did you tension the belts upon replacement with a tensioning gage? I know this may seem basic, but I always tend to start with the point of last known human intervention.



From the original questioner:
Thanks for the response.

1. Aluminum pulleys had teeth that had worn to a sharp edge as opposed to the new pulleys, which have a flat on the top of the teeth. Old belts showed very little wear, but were replaced with new as a matter of preventative maintenance.

2. The lack of repetition is in fact consistent and does appear to happen very close to the transition from + to - on both the X and Y axis, regardless of the program run. The deviation of the cut does also appear consistent.

3. All covers are removed and operation observed numerous times at both normal speed and at 25% of normal rout speed. Results of rout are the same regardless. No visible wobble of pulley or movement of belts on pulleys from side to side.

4. Alas, I did not use a tensioning gauge when installing the belts, other than a 2' bar and my shoulder. The belts are very tight, have little deflection and could be said to "sing" when plucked. I know that's not quantitative, but that's the situation.



From contributor J:
Just wondering what the condition of the keys and keyways on the shafts are. From repeated acceleration and deceleration over the years they can get a little stepped and not hold their position, etc.

A two foot bar and your shoulder and belts that sing sets alarm bells ringing for me. This could be a case of overloaded servos and bearings that are finding it hard to interpolate smoothly on the circles when synchronized axes movements are important. Try backing off the tension and putting very little pressure on the bracket motor, etc. when tightening bolts, and run the machine at low feed rates to see if the problem returns. The belts can get by with a lot less tension than you might think and slight deflection with finger pressure would be okay, as the teeth do the driving and not the tension.

Also, this might sound silly at this stage, but are the pulleys and belts the same pitch, i.e. not metric and inch mixed together? 6mm to 1/4 and 8mm to 5/16. Ya never know.



From the original questioner:
Points well taken. When I return to work on Monday I will relax the belts on the machine. I may have overdone it the second time around. I will say that my first installation did not involve much leverage on the pulley/belt arrangement and I only went back and readjusted after no improvement in performance. As to the belt issue, metric v. English, I think I have to trust the fact that the numbers on the replacement belts from Anderson matched the ones being replaced. Don't know how to check otherwise; they appear the same visually.


From contributor C:
I'm a programmer in a shop with an Andi Stratos Pro. Ours is a 2004 model and I have no idea how much it may differ from yours. Along with programming, I'm responsible for any and all maintenance on it. After reading your post I was curious as to weather we had belts and pulleys that may need future service. So today I opened up the Y axis service panel to look at them. Belt is not tight at all, about 1/2" play. I did notice that the two pulleys are not the same size and have red paint on them as timing marks. The upper pulley was the larger of the two and for every revolution, the lower one on the servo turned 1 1/3 turns. I don't know if this info helps or not, just thought I'd pass it on to a fellow Andi user.


From the original questioner:
Thanks to all of you for your input on my problem. For future reference, if any of you experience the same type of failure, check your system parameters at the time of failure with the system parameters in your maintenance manual. Our Fanuc rep came up today and found that the parameters varied wildly from the specified numbers. According to Fanuc, this should only change if manually inputted, which they were not. Machine is running great again with original parameters re-inputted. Don't know why they changed. We have had numerous power failures in the area recently, but again, that should not cause the error according to Fanuc. In any case, that'll be the first thing I check if I notice a discrepancy again. Apparently the fact that we changed pulleys and belts on the X and Y axis did not have an effect as I previously suspected.


From contributor M:
Glad to hear your issue is resolved. As a side note - if you do not already have it, I would strongly advise you to get some form of surge protection for the control.


From the original questioner:
Thanks for the advice. Wednesday AM I will investigate the surge protection issue as to what we have and what we should have. Having only been working in this capacity for 5 months, I am still very much on the learning curve.


From contributor I:
I would also recommend making a backup copy of the parameters on a floppy/cd/jump drive and/or screen shots of all the parameter settings. Then if it ever happens again you know exactly what the settings have to be.


From the original questioner:
Right on. Did that before the tech left the building. One of those "aha!" moments. Thanks.

Would you like to add information to this article?
Interested in writing or submitting an article?
Have a question about this article?


Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below?
  • KnowledgeBase: Knowledge Base

  • KnowledgeBase: Computerization

  • KnowledgeBase: Computerization: CNC Machinery and Techniques


    Would you like to add information to this article? ... Click Here

    If you have a question regarding a Knowledge Base article, your best chance at uncovering an answer is to search the entire Knowledge Base for related articles or to post your question at the appropriate WOODWEB Forum. Before posting your message, be sure to
    review our Forum Guidelines.

    Questions entered in the Knowledge Base Article comment form will not generate responses! A list of WOODWEB Forums can be found at WOODWEB's Site Map.

    When you post your question at the Forum, be sure to include references to the Knowledge Base article that inspired your question. The more information you provide with your question, the better your chances are of receiving responses.

    Return to beginning of article.



    Refer a Friend || Read This Important Information || Site Map || Privacy Policy || Site User Agreement

    Letters, questions or comments? E-Mail us and let us know what you think. Be sure to review our Frequently Asked Questions page.

    Contact us to discuss advertising or to report problems with this site.

    To report a problem, send an e-mail to our Webmaster

    Copyright © 1996-2017 - WOODWEB ® Inc.
    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any manner without permission of the Editor.
    Review WOODWEB's Copyright Policy.

    The editors, writers, and staff at WOODWEB try to promote safe practices. What is safe for one woodworker under certain conditions may not be safe for others in different circumstances. Readers should undertake the use of materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk.

    WOODWEB, Inc.
    335 Bedell Road
    Montrose, PA 18801

    Contact WOODWEB











  • WOODWEB - the leading resource for professional woodworkers


      Home » Knowledge Base » Knowledge Base Article