Today's
Sponsors:


People Logic Software Corp.

Pinske Edge

Pioneer Lumber Company

Planit Solutions

Porter-Cable

Preservation Solutions

Prime Estimating and Software Services, LLC

Primo Woodworking Machinery

Pro.Woodworker.com

Professional Machinery Group

Quality VAKuum Products, Inc.

Quickscrews International Corporation

QuickScribe

QuickWood, Inc.

QuikDrawers

R&R Drummond, Inc.

R.A.W.

RazorGage

Rex Lumber Company

Riethmiller Lumber

Ritter Manufacturing Inc.

Roberts WebForge, Inc.

Rockler Woodworking and Hardware

Roger Shaw and Associates

Rose Machinery

RouterCAD

RT Machine Co.

Safety Speed Cut

Sand-Rite Manufacturing

Sandman Products

Sawmill and Woodlot Magazine

SCM Group USA

Sears Trostel Lumber Co.

ShopBot

SII Dry Kilns

Silvaris

Simantech

SIS Machinery

SNX Technologies

South State Machinery

Southeast Tool, Inc.

Sovereign Machine, Inc.

Specialtytools.com

Speed Sander

Sprayguncaptain.com

Steve H. Wall Lumber Co.

Stiles Machinery

Stiles Shop Solutions

Super Source Tooling Inc.

Supergrit Abrasives

T-Tool USA LLC

Taghkanic CNC Services

TaylorCraft Cabinet Door Company

Techno CNC Routers

Oneida Air Systems

Onsrud Cutter

Opti-Sand

Optisol for Project Scheduling

Orange Aluminum

Original Saw Company

ORMA North America

Osborne Wood Products

Paragon Enterprises

Paul Cabinet Sourcing

Penn Sylvan International




Understanding Transfer Efficiency

      A quick discussion of "transfer efficiency" — how much of what you spray actually ends up sticking to the workpiece. July 14, 2010

Question
I am looking for thoughts and advice on transfer efficiency? What does it really mean? How much of it depends on proper set up by the equipment user? How is it tested and how do we know how accurate the ratings are we see? I have a lot of different equipment and I think, judging by the eyeball test, that my turbine unit produces by far the best efficiency. I also have a pricey HVLP that I think is terrible. I’m interested to hear what you all have to say.

Forum Responses
(Finishing Forum)
From contributor W:
Transfer efficiency is the percentage of material that covers the surface from the overall material applied in the surface. There is a major opinion that the H.V.L.P. gun and the airless gun have better transfer efficiency with the air spray gun. Actually it really depends on the form and shape of the furniture product sprayed, the skill of the operator, and the condition of the spraying equipment.



From contributor K:
Transfer efficiency is a comparative guideline only. The term refers to the ratio of finish that actually stays on the sprayed item compared to the amount sprayed. The losses come from primarily from overspray. Think of the billows of clouds that are created with a compressor-driven gun - that is finish that doesn't hit the item. Compressor-driven spray guns are typically credited with being in the 30%-35% efficiency range, HVLP's in the 70% range. Some air-assisted airless units purport to be in the 95% range.

The percentages are only a relative and test lab indication. If the exact items are sprayed comparing compressor-driver and HVLP for instance, you will use less material overall, with the HVLP unit, to get the final amount of finish that you desire on the item. The actual percentages that you get will depend on the items being sprayed. Spraying a line-up of chairs will be inherently less efficient than spraying a line of cabinet doors. Part of the issue is the psi at the spray head, which will cause less or more bounce-back.

Individual techniques will affect efficiency to a degree. Just one instance: a wide fan will be less efficient (in terms finish-to-loss-ratio) than a narrow fan. In spite of what one shop owner adamantly claimed about his "95% efficient" rig, spraying spindle-back chairs will never come close to that number. Possibly using a brush could get you close. I set up a spreadsheet, based on his lacquer usage, to show how long it would take to recoup his $4000 cost for the rig, using the differences in efficiencies for HVLP and his new equipment. The answer: 10-12 years. For him, the purchase was closer to being a toy rather than a tool. Plus, there was a great salesman in that area. Having said all of the above, some systems may be more productive than others, regardless of efficiency.



Would you like to add information to this article?
Interested in writing or submitting an article?
Have a question about this article?


Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below?
  • KnowledgeBase: Knowledge Base

  • KnowledgeBase: Finishing

  • KnowledgeBase: Finishing: General Wood Finishing




    Would you like to add information to this article? ... Click Here

    If you have a question regarding a Knowledge Base article, your best chance at uncovering an answer is to search the entire Knowledge Base for related articles or to post your question at the appropriate WOODWEB Forum. Before posting your message, be sure to
    review our Forum Guidelines.

    Questions entered in the Knowledge Base Article comment form will not generate responses! A list of WOODWEB Forums can be found at WOODWEB's Site Map.

    When you post your question at the Forum, be sure to include references to the Knowledge Base article that inspired your question. The more information you provide with your question, the better your chances are of receiving responses.

    Return to beginning of article.



    Refer a Friend || Read This Important Information || Site Map || Privacy Policy || Site User Agreement

    Letters, questions or comments? E-Mail us and let us know what you think. Be sure to review our Frequently Asked Questions page.

    Contact us to discuss advertising or to report problems with this site.

    To report a problem, send an e-mail to our Webmaster

    Copyright © 1996-2012 - WOODWEB ® Inc.
    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any manner without permission of the Editor.
    Review WOODWEB's Copyright Policy.

    The editors, writers, and staff at WOODWEB try to promote safe practices. What is safe for one woodworker under certain conditions may not be safe for others in different circumstances. Readers should undertake the use of materials and methods discussed at WOODWEB after considerate evaluation, and at their own risk.

    WOODWEB, Inc.
    335 Bedell Road
    Montrose, PA 18801

    Contact WOODWEB













  •   Home » Knowledge Base » Knowledge Base Article