Hi Gerben,
Upgrading from manual to automatic is a wise decision that will significantly improve the efficiency of your one-person workshop. Based on your usage scenario of approximately 100 hours per year, primarily using thin edge banding (0.5/1mm), my analysis is as follows:
The key to "entry-level" here is "simplicity," not "inferiority." The Streamer 1057, as a new generation basic model, is designed to meet specific, low-to-medium intensity production needs. For your workload, its capabilities and reliability are likely more than sufficient, and the 30k price difference represents real cost savings.
Before making a decision, I recommend you verify two specific points with the dealer or manufacturer:
Thin edge banding compatibility: Specifically ask about the stability and ease of adjustment of the Streamer's feeding, gluing, and pressing systems when continuously processing 0.5mm PVC edge banding. This is your most frequently used specification, and you must ensure its reliability.
Long-term maintenance and spare parts: As a one-person shop, the self-maintainability of the equipment is crucial. Inquire about the complexity of routine maintenance (such as cleaning the glue pot and replacing wear parts), the time required, and the price and availability differences of common spare parts for both models.
Summary recommendation: If the Streamer performs stably with thin banding and is sufficiently user-friendly for routine maintenance, then it is likely the more cost-effective option. Using the saved budget on high-quality tools or materials may yield more significant direct returns for your business.
Of course, if you plan to significantly increase the thickness of materials used in the future (such as solid wood edge banding) or work with mixed materials, the higher adjustment precision and adaptability offered by the Auriga's full servo system will be its long-term value.
I hope this analysis based on your specific business needs will help you make your decision.
Member